Good for Hilary, she triggered the right!

 

And got you to expose your stupid and your lies again.

 

Fucking hilarious.

Trump’s conspiracy lawsuit against Hillary Clinton dismissed — and judge hints at penalties for his attorneys

Travis Gettys
September 09, 2022



Donald Trump delivering a speech at a campaign rally held at the Mohegan Sun Arena. (Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.com)


A judge dismissed Donald Trump's racketeering lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and hinted that his attorneys could be penalized for bringing the case.

District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks filed a 193-page ruling that finds Trump's allegations were "neither short nor plain," and the judge found many of the claims unfounded and ridiculous.

"Many of the Amended Complaint’s characterizations of events are implausible because they lack any specific allegations which might provide factual support for the conclusions reached," Middlebrooks found. "For instance, the contention that former FBI director James Comey, senior FBI officials, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein 'overzealously targeted' Plaintiff and conspired to harm him through appointment of special counsel are strikingly similar to the conclusory and formulaic allegations found deficient in the seminal Supreme Court case of Ashcroft v. Iqbal."


Brad Heath

@bradheath
·
Follow

A federal court in Florida has dismissed - for many different reasons - former President Trump's lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, various government officials and various others over "Russiagate." https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157.267.0.pdf



5:25 AM · Sep 9, 2022

"What the Amended Complaint lacks in substance and legal support it seeks to substitute with length, hyperbole, and the settling of scores and grievances," the judge added. "Plaintiff has annotated the Amended Complaint with 293 footnotes containing references to various public reports and findings. He is not required to annotate his Complaint; in fact, it is inconsistent with Rule 8’s requirement of a short and plain statement of the claim. But if a party chooses to include such references, it is expected that they be presented in good faith and with evidentiary support. Unfortunately, that is not the case here."

The judge said the evidence did not show any reason why Trump should be entitled to any of the relief he sought, and he cited a federal rule authorizing sanctions against lawyers who filed claims that aren't supported by evidence or existing law.

"In presenting a pleading, an attorney certifies that it is not being presented for any improper purpose; that the claims are warranted under the law; and that the factual contentions have evidentiary support," Middlebrooks wrote.

"By filing the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff’s lawyers certified to the Court that, to the best of their knowledge, 'the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law,' and that 'the factual contentions have evidentiary support,'” the judge added. "I have serious doubts about whether that standard is met here."

Trump's attorneys Alina Habba and Peter Ticktin unsuccessfully tried to get the case before District Court Judge Aileen Cannon, but instead it landed in the court overseen by Middlebrooks, who wasn't happy with the filing.

"Plaintiff is not attempting to seek redress for any legal harm," Middlebrooks ruled in his dismissal. "He is seeking to flaunt a 200-page political manifesto outlining his grievances against those that have opposed him, and this Court is not the appropriate forum."

NOW WATCH: Steve Bannon's 'sham effort to build a wall' results in indictment after $15 million stolen

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton/

 

Trump is a master of frivolous lawsuits. That is what his legal efforts to reverse the last election amounted to. When Trump's lawyers were required to present evidence of election fraud they did not have any.

 

Why? Because she's their judge?

Yes! She is!

 

Or maybe it's just your obsession with her...

 

Hildabeast:
Hillary Clinton accuses GOP of scheming to 'literally steal the next presidential election'
Clinton's claim comes as the Supreme Court hears a case about state legislatures' ability to govern elections

 

After scores of Clinton investigations and no indictments we must ask is Clinton actually innocent or are scores of Congressional committees and prosecutors just that incompetent.

And hey guys how's that Durham investigation going after three and a half years? If Durham has indicted Clinton, Obama, Comey, McCabe, Strzok and most the Obama administration like treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans said he would I must have missed it.

 

Imitation is the best compliment.
Stumbler needs to be more patient.
As the despicables learned with their impeachments and endless investigations, trumped up charges (pun intended) don't get very far if only half of your audience is in on your plan.

After mid terms, when control of Congress sits with deplorables, we'll probably see some new investigations started. One thing is for sure, Nancy Antoinette and the power rangers along with the Comey/McCabe/Strzok bunch will be diving for the shelters. It won't take much to trigger deplorables. A Trump perp walk would do nicely.

 

Hillary Clinton peddling a 'disinformation campaign' about Supreme Court election law case, legal experts say:

 

Despicables have tried to sell the idea that clinton is old news and no longer holding any sway in despicable politics.
Even as they still obsess over all things Trump.

But it was hillary who planted the idea in stumblers head that Gabbard is a Russian asset with no proof at all, and Clinton who claims the deplorables are about to steal mid terms and Clinton who keeps yammering about the court.

Karma's a bitch, despicables.
Accept it.

 

Really? Where? I was only able to find comments about the next presidential election. But I'm sure you'll be curmudgeonly hesitant to share proof, only spinning to blame me for your lack of proof.